<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What To Do with 3-5 Year Money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/what-to-do-with-3-5-year-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/what-to-do-with-3-5-year-money/</link>
	<description>Index Investing: The Oblivious Investor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:57:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Manshu</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/what-to-do-with-3-5-year-money/comment-page-1/#comment-1179</link>
		<dc:creator>Manshu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 19:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=1783#comment-1179</guid>
		<description>If you need that money to spend, then you are better off staying away from the market is what I&#039;d think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you need that money to spend, then you are better off staying away from the market is what I&#8217;d think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/what-to-do-with-3-5-year-money/comment-page-1/#comment-1168</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=1783#comment-1168</guid>
		<description>Thanks to all three of you for contributing suggestions. It looks like--while the specifics varied somewhat--we&#039;re all on a similar page here: Keep stock exposure to a minimum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to all three of you for contributing suggestions. It looks like&#8211;while the specifics varied somewhat&#8211;we&#8217;re all on a similar page here: Keep stock exposure to a minimum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the weakonomist</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/what-to-do-with-3-5-year-money/comment-page-1/#comment-1167</link>
		<dc:creator>the weakonomist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=1783#comment-1167</guid>
		<description>I would suggest a 3 year CD.  This will lock up the money and the user won&#039;t be tempted to use it for anything.

But if we want to play around a bit with markets, perhaps a target 2010 ETF or mutual fund.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would suggest a 3 year CD.  This will lock up the money and the user won&#8217;t be tempted to use it for anything.</p>
<p>But if we want to play around a bit with markets, perhaps a target 2010 ETF or mutual fund.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Williams @ Crackerjack Greenback</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/what-to-do-with-3-5-year-money/comment-page-1/#comment-1166</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Williams @ Crackerjack Greenback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 03:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=1783#comment-1166</guid>
		<description>If you want to be reasonably sure you won&#039;t lose money over any 3-5 year period, your best choice is to have 0-10% in stocks (a diversified portfolio) and the rest in an equal split of short-term and intermediate-term bonds.

Mike, if you remember my posts on diversified portfolios in December, one of the things I looked at is how often the portfolios would lose money over different time periods.  A 100% bond portfolio never lost money over any 3 year period since 1927, and a 90% bond portfolio (10% stocks) never lost money over any 5 year period since 1927.  During any consecutive 3 years from 1927 to 2007, the 10% stock portfolio lost money 2 times out of a possible 79 periods. The two worst 3 year periods were 1929-1931 and 1930-1932, when the portfolio lost about 2.7% and 0.3% of its original value, respectively.

So I agree with you, for money you&#039;ll need in 3-5 years you should only put a small portion in stocks (&lt;10%).  The rest could be easily split between a short-term and intermediate-term bond fund (Vanguard has one for each).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to be reasonably sure you won&#8217;t lose money over any 3-5 year period, your best choice is to have 0-10% in stocks (a diversified portfolio) and the rest in an equal split of short-term and intermediate-term bonds.</p>
<p>Mike, if you remember my posts on diversified portfolios in December, one of the things I looked at is how often the portfolios would lose money over different time periods.  A 100% bond portfolio never lost money over any 3 year period since 1927, and a 90% bond portfolio (10% stocks) never lost money over any 5 year period since 1927.  During any consecutive 3 years from 1927 to 2007, the 10% stock portfolio lost money 2 times out of a possible 79 periods. The two worst 3 year periods were 1929-1931 and 1930-1932, when the portfolio lost about 2.7% and 0.3% of its original value, respectively.</p>
<p>So I agree with you, for money you&#8217;ll need in 3-5 years you should only put a small portion in stocks (&lt;10%).  The rest could be easily split between a short-term and intermediate-term bond fund (Vanguard has one for each).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boyan Penkov</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/what-to-do-with-3-5-year-money/comment-page-1/#comment-1165</link>
		<dc:creator>Boyan Penkov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=1783#comment-1165</guid>
		<description>What about this?

30%: Short-term corporate bonds
30%: Inter-term corporates
40%: Balanced index (40% total bond index, 60% total stock index).

The net allocation is thus: ~75% bond, ~25% stock.

There is some volatility in bonds, so keep your 1-2 year money in CDs or liquid, high-rate savings accounts or (insured) money market accounts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about this?</p>
<p>30%: Short-term corporate bonds<br />
30%: Inter-term corporates<br />
40%: Balanced index (40% total bond index, 60% total stock index).</p>
<p>The net allocation is thus: ~75% bond, ~25% stock.</p>
<p>There is some volatility in bonds, so keep your 1-2 year money in CDs or liquid, high-rate savings accounts or (insured) money market accounts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
