<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tax Diversification: Roth IRA vs. Traditional IRA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/tax-diversification-roth-ira-vs-traditional-ira/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/tax-diversification-roth-ira-vs-traditional-ira/</link>
	<description>Index Investing: The Oblivious Investor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:19:14 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Investor Junkie</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/tax-diversification-roth-ira-vs-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-4185</link>
		<dc:creator>Investor Junkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=5309#comment-4185</guid>
		<description>One issue that was not mentioned, political risk.  Will our government change the rules on us mid-stream?  This is one risk with going with a Roth IRA, you assume the government will keep it not taxable.  If not directly, it&#039;s possible indirectly.

This was just discussed in the comments section of the WSJ:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126004888014078557.html#articleTabs%3Dcomments</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One issue that was not mentioned, political risk.  Will our government change the rules on us mid-stream?  This is one risk with going with a Roth IRA, you assume the government will keep it not taxable.  If not directly, it&#8217;s possible indirectly.</p>
<p>This was just discussed in the comments section of the WSJ:</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126004888014078557.html#articleTabs%3Dcomments" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126004888014078557.html#articleTabs%3Dcomments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/tax-diversification-roth-ira-vs-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-4127</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 17:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=5309#comment-4127</guid>
		<description>The key to the Roth decision is not if you think your tax bracket will be higher. The important thing is if you &quot;know&quot; your tax bracket will be higher. For over 95% of savers, paying the taxes up front rather than deferring them compounds the risk that they will have insufficient retirement income. Only after that risk has been eliminated should one consider a Roth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key to the Roth decision is not if you think your tax bracket will be higher. The important thing is if you &#8220;know&#8221; your tax bracket will be higher. For over 95% of savers, paying the taxes up front rather than deferring them compounds the risk that they will have insufficient retirement income. Only after that risk has been eliminated should one consider a Roth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/tax-diversification-roth-ira-vs-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-4059</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=5309#comment-4059</guid>
		<description>EoW:

To me, if you have a Roth option in your 401k, it just goes in step #3. When going back to max out the 401k, put some of it in Roth, some of it in traditional. (Of course, this is just a rough guideline. If a person has a reasonable degree of certainty that their tax bracket will be higher/lower in retirement, then it may make sense to do all Roth or no Roth in the 401k.)

As to life insurance, I have yet to see an insurance product that I&#039;d recommend over simply using ETFs in a taxable account for most investors, though a) I suppose that could change, and b) that doesn&#039;t apply to every single situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EoW:</p>
<p>To me, if you have a Roth option in your 401k, it just goes in step #3. When going back to max out the 401k, put some of it in Roth, some of it in traditional. (Of course, this is just a rough guideline. If a person has a reasonable degree of certainty that their tax bracket will be higher/lower in retirement, then it may make sense to do all Roth or no Roth in the 401k.)</p>
<p>As to life insurance, I have yet to see an insurance product that I&#8217;d recommend over simply using ETFs in a taxable account for most investors, though a) I suppose that could change, and b) that doesn&#8217;t apply to every single situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Francis</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/tax-diversification-roth-ira-vs-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-4058</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=5309#comment-4058</guid>
		<description>Another advantage of having some money in a Roth IRA is no minimum required distributions. You could choose to leave those tax free investments to your children.

-Rick Francis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another advantage of having some money in a Roth IRA is no minimum required distributions. You could choose to leave those tax free investments to your children.</p>
<p>-Rick Francis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evolution Of Wealth</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/tax-diversification-roth-ira-vs-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-4057</link>
		<dc:creator>Evolution Of Wealth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=5309#comment-4057</guid>
		<description>Any thoughts on how to mix in the Roth 401k?  
What do you think #4 being life insurance instead of the taxable account?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any thoughts on how to mix in the Roth 401k?<br />
What do you think #4 being life insurance instead of the taxable account?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
