<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Survey says&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/survey-says/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/survey-says/</link>
	<description>Investing Blog: The Oblivious Investor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:02:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/survey-says/comment-page-1/#comment-1506</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 22:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=4387#comment-1506</guid>
		<description>You’re absolutely right that the personal finance blogosphere is getting crowded. From that perspective, it might make sense to do exactly the opposite of what I originally suggested. Perhaps try playing up the fact that you’re in the UK? (Put it in the page title/tagline/include the idea somehow in the logo?)

As to running out of topics: Well, sure. I really only have a handful of them to start with. :)

But I feel like I have a practically unlimited amount to say about each of those topics, hehe. And with “don’t worry about what happens in the day-to-day market” being one of my primary concepts, I think there will always be a need for somebody to take whatever is going on in the news, step back a bit, and try to put it in perspective.

And thanks for the book suggestion–just added it to my Swaptree list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You’re absolutely right that the personal finance blogosphere is getting crowded. From that perspective, it might make sense to do exactly the opposite of what I originally suggested. Perhaps try playing up the fact that you’re in the UK? (Put it in the page title/tagline/include the idea somehow in the logo?)</p>
<p>As to running out of topics: Well, sure. I really only have a handful of them to start with. <img src='http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But I feel like I have a practically unlimited amount to say about each of those topics, hehe. And with “don’t worry about what happens in the day-to-day market” being one of my primary concepts, I think there will always be a need for somebody to take whatever is going on in the news, step back a bit, and try to put it in perspective.</p>
<p>And thanks for the book suggestion–just added it to my Swaptree list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monevator</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/survey-says/comment-page-1/#comment-1504</link>
		<dc:creator>Monevator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 22:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=4387#comment-1504</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike, thanks for your thoughts. You make a good point, perhaps that would be an interesting way to spin it. I think I do have to find some sort of competitive difference... It&#039;s getting crowded in the blogosphere.

Your Oblivious Investing brand is great from that point of view. My only concern is are you worried you&#039;ll run out of topics?

I saw an interesting book in a store today by a US writer that you might want to have a look at btw. It was called the &#039;Gone Fishing Portfolio&#039; if I remember correctly. It was 10 ETFs, but some odd ones like gold miners as well as most of the core assets of course. He claims it&#039;s outperformed the S+P with less volatility (haven&#039;t got it to hand, so can&#039;t quote exactly).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike, thanks for your thoughts. You make a good point, perhaps that would be an interesting way to spin it. I think I do have to find some sort of competitive difference&#8230; It&#8217;s getting crowded in the blogosphere.</p>
<p>Your Oblivious Investing brand is great from that point of view. My only concern is are you worried you&#8217;ll run out of topics?</p>
<p>I saw an interesting book in a store today by a US writer that you might want to have a look at btw. It was called the &#8216;Gone Fishing Portfolio&#8217; if I remember correctly. It was 10 ETFs, but some odd ones like gold miners as well as most of the core assets of course. He claims it&#8217;s outperformed the S+P with less volatility (haven&#8217;t got it to hand, so can&#8217;t quote exactly).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/survey-says/comment-page-1/#comment-1503</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 12:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=4387#comment-1503</guid>
		<description>&quot;You’ve got to remember of course Mike that you’re asking *your* audience, not the audience that might be reading if you added X or Y.&quot;

Indeed. Still busy working on how to deal with that information though, heh.

As to growing your blog: Is it particularly important that the readers you attract be UK readers? My experience reading your site is that all of the same investing principles apply, which is why I link to it all the time despite the fact that 75% of my visitors are from the US.

I wonder how/if it would affect your articles/marketing if you thought of your blog as &quot;a personal finance blog in the UK&quot; rather than &quot;a UK personal finance blog.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You’ve got to remember of course Mike that you’re asking *your* audience, not the audience that might be reading if you added X or Y.&#8221;</p>
<p>Indeed. Still busy working on how to deal with that information though, heh.</p>
<p>As to growing your blog: Is it particularly important that the readers you attract be UK readers? My experience reading your site is that all of the same investing principles apply, which is why I link to it all the time despite the fact that 75% of my visitors are from the US.</p>
<p>I wonder how/if it would affect your articles/marketing if you thought of your blog as &#8220;a personal finance blog in the UK&#8221; rather than &#8220;a UK personal finance blog.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monevator</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/survey-says/comment-page-1/#comment-1502</link>
		<dc:creator>Monevator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 08:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=4387#comment-1502</guid>
		<description>Interesting findings. You&#039;ve got to remember of course Mike that you&#039;re asking *your* audience, not the audience that might be reading if you added X or Y. But you know that.

I&#039;m still finding it a huge challenge to grow my UK focused blog. I don&#039;t have the US competition, but equally the UK types don&#039;t seem to get so passionate about money. I&#039;ve started thinking I may need to go more personal, but that&#039;ll probably take me down a much more mark-to-market How Am I Doing approach that you wouldn&#039;t approve of... and which could be bad for my bank balance! ;)

Anyway, congrats on the growth of OI. Your crisp clean articles deserve a wide readership, and it&#039;s nice to see the comments taking off.

As you&#039;re getting more active on Twitter, maybe you should put a link on the home page?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting findings. You&#8217;ve got to remember of course Mike that you&#8217;re asking *your* audience, not the audience that might be reading if you added X or Y. But you know that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still finding it a huge challenge to grow my UK focused blog. I don&#8217;t have the US competition, but equally the UK types don&#8217;t seem to get so passionate about money. I&#8217;ve started thinking I may need to go more personal, but that&#8217;ll probably take me down a much more mark-to-market How Am I Doing approach that you wouldn&#8217;t approve of&#8230; and which could be bad for my bank balance! <img src='http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Anyway, congrats on the growth of OI. Your crisp clean articles deserve a wide readership, and it&#8217;s nice to see the comments taking off.</p>
<p>As you&#8217;re getting more active on Twitter, maybe you should put a link on the home page?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/survey-says/comment-page-1/#comment-1483</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 22:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=4387#comment-1483</guid>
		<description>George: That&#039;s a good idea. I&#039;ll work on including a discussion of Taleb&#039;s ideas in an upcoming post. Having read (and thoroughly enjoyed) both of those books, I&#039;m a big fan of his constantly-skeptical way of thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George: That&#8217;s a good idea. I&#8217;ll work on including a discussion of Taleb&#8217;s ideas in an upcoming post. Having read (and thoroughly enjoyed) both of those books, I&#8217;m a big fan of his constantly-skeptical way of thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/survey-says/comment-page-1/#comment-1479</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 20:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=4387#comment-1479</guid>
		<description>In regards to avoiding historical data, how about a discussion of Nassim Nicholas Taleb&#039;s ideas in The Black Swan and Fooled by Randomness impact an oblivious investor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regards to avoiding historical data, how about a discussion of Nassim Nicholas Taleb&#8217;s ideas in The Black Swan and Fooled by Randomness impact an oblivious investor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJ</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/survey-says/comment-page-1/#comment-1457</link>
		<dc:creator>SJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 16:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=4387#comment-1457</guid>
		<description>&quot;(More on this later though, it needs to be cleaned up a bit so that it’s fit for **outside consumption.**)&quot;

Lol nice =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;(More on this later though, it needs to be cleaned up a bit so that it’s fit for **outside consumption.**)&#8221;</p>
<p>Lol nice =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

