When Should I Take Social Security Benefits? (Single Investor)

Note: This analysis is written with regard to unmarried investors. For married people, there are additional considerations. We’ll get to those considerations eventually, but I thought it made sense to start with the simplest scenario first.

The first step in deciding when to take Social Security retirement benefits is to see how much your benefits will increase for each year that you delay claiming them.

To see exactly how much your benefit will grow as you delay from age 62 to your “full retirement age” (your FRA is somewhere between 65 and 67, depending on when you were born), click on the year of your birth in this chart. For example, if you were born between 1943 and 1954, your FRA is 66. If you claim benefits on your birthday at:

  • Age 62: You’ll get 75% of your retirement benefit,
  • Age 63: You’ll get 80% of your retirement benefit,
  • Age 64: You’ll get 86.7% of your retirement benefit,
  • Age 65: You’ll get 93.3% of your retirement benefit,
  • Age 66: You’ll get 100% of your retirement benefit

And for everybody born after 1943, every year that you delay beyond full retirement age (up to age 70) results in an 8% increase in benefits. So, for someone with an FRA of 66, if you claim benefits at:

  • Age 67: You’ll get 108% of your retirement benefit,
  • Age 68: You’ll get 116% of your retirement benefit,
  • Age 69: You’ll get 124% of your retirement benefit,
  • Age 70: You’ll get 132% of you retirement benefit.

Social Security as an Annuity

Delaying Social Security is like buying a lifetime annuity: You give up a certain amount of money right now (this year’s benefits) in exchange for a stream of payments for the rest of your life.

For example, for somebody born in 1950 (such that the numbers above would apply), if her benefit at full retirement age would be $1,000 per month, her benefit at age 62 would be $750 per month, and at age 63 it would be $800 per month.

Therefore, waiting from age 62 to age 63 is the equivalent of paying a $9,000 premium ($750 foregone monthly income x 12 months) in exchange for a lifetime inflation-adjusted annuity that pays $600 per year ($50 additional benefits per month x 12 months).

That’s a 6.67% payout ($600 ÷ $9,000). By way of comparison:

  • Vanguard’s annuity quote system indicates that a 63 year old female purchasing an inflation-indexed lifetime annuity from an insurance company would only get a payout of 4.54% (and it would carry higher credit risk, as it wouldn’t be backed by the Federal government).
  • For retirees with a non-annuitized portfolio, many experts suggest limiting annual withdrawals to 4% of the portfolio.

A similar analysis can be performed for each year up to age 70. Conclusion: Delaying Social Security benefits can be an excellent way to increase the amount of income you can safely take from your portfolio.

Reasons Not to Delay Social Security

There are, of course, some circumstances in which it doesn’t make sense for an unmarried investor to delay taking Social Security. For instance:

  • If you need the income right now, then there’s obviously no real choice.
  • If you have reason to think that you won’t live to the average life expectancy for somebody your age*, then annuitizing–whether via a purchased annuity or via delaying Social Security–is generally unwise.
  • Because of the unique way in which Social Security benefits are taxed, there are sometimes tax-planning reasons to claim benefits early (if you expect your taxable income to be significantly higher in late retirement than early retirement, for example).

*There are no differences in rules for men as opposed to women, so remember to use a gender-neutral life expectancy for this comparison. (The result here is that men are less likely to benefit from delaying benefits than women are.)

Retiring Soon? Pick Up a Copy of My Book:

Can I Retire Cover

Can I Retire? Managing a Retirement Portfolio Explained in 100 Pages or Less

Topics Covered in the Book:
  • How to calculate how much you’ll need saved before you can retire,
  • How to minimize the risk of outliving your money,
  • How to choose which accounts (Roth vs. traditional IRA vs. taxable) to withdraw from each year,
  • Click here to see the full list.

A Testimonial from a Reader on Amazon:

"Hands down the best overview of what it takes to truly retire that I've ever read. In jargon free English, this gem of a book nails the key issues."

Comments

  1. Hi Mike – I really enjoy the basic common-sense info on your blog, keep up the good work!

    There are obviously too many variables to consider regarding taking social security to be able to give one-size-fits-all guidelines, but I wanted to point out one non-financial consideraton: with the break-even point of taking benefits at 62 vs 70 generally falling somewhere around age 80, for people who have ample resources they need to consider the USEFULNESS of the income between ages 62 and 80 versus ages 80 and say 98.

    Each person has to make their own decision, but my experience is that generally people are as healthy and active as they can in those earlier years of retirement, and then at some point they’ve “been there, done that, got the t-shirt” and the extra income is less useful.

    I googled ‘social security break even’ to find a quick verification of the break even point being somewhere around age 80, and found a good article from BusinessWeek http://www.businessweek.com/managing/content/dec2007/ca2007126_001044_page_2.htm. Coincidentally a colleague of mine in the fee-only Alliance of Cambridge Advisors, Bert Whitehead, was quoted in the article and he made a good point that if one invests the social security income they receive between ages 62 and 70 then the breakeven point gets pushed out to somewhere into age 92+.

    I didn’t realize he was in that article, but at the risk of being biased in that I know he’s a great financial planner I think it’s a worthwhile read.

  2. Mike says:

    Hi John.

    That’s a good point about the utility of money at different ages. Definitely worth considering.

    As to delaying SS and investing the benefits, my own calculations (for a person born in 1950), show the break-even point somewhere during age 89 for a 5% after-inflation return.

    In my opinion though, the most fair comparison is to use a return that could be reliably earned with risk-free investments, given that that’s what Social Security is. If you use a 2% after-inflation return, the break-even point occurs during age 83.

    In other words:

    • For an investor whose goal is to maximize wealth for heirs and who doesn’t mind taking on a little extra market risk, then I agree that taking SS early is usually the way to go.
    • For an investor who is worried about a real possibility of outliving their money, I still think that delaying Social Security makes sense in many (though of course not all) cases.
  3. JoeTaxpayer says:

    I look forward to the discussion for marrieds. My wife is 6 year older, and the numbers for one of us collecting on the other’s benefit while letting their own benefit rise is an interesting concept.

  4. Jay says:

    Mike

    Appreciate the article on this topic. I was clueless when it came to SS (thankfully I am almost 25 years away from SS) . This article gave me some food for thought. I will be looking fwd for the married ones analysis

    Thanks for taking time writing informative articles, Mike.

Disclaimer: By using this site, you explicitly agree to its Terms of Use and agree not to hold Simple Subjects, LLC or any of its members liable in any way for damages arising from decisions you make based on the information made available on this site. I am not a financial or investment advisor, and the information on this site is for informational and entertainment purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.

Copyright 2012 Simple Subjects, LLC - All rights reserved. To be clear: This means that, aside from small quotations, the material on this site may not be republished elsewhere without my express permission. Terms of Use and Privacy Policy