﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quantitative Investment Strategies: Pros and Cons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/quantitative-investment-strategies-pros-and-cons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/quantitative-investment-strategies-pros-and-cons/</link>
	<description>Investing Blog: The Oblivious Investor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:11:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/quantitative-investment-strategies-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-1252</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=2481#comment-1252</guid>
		<description>Hi rm. Thanks for the book suggestion. I just added it to my swaptree list. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi rm. Thanks for the book suggestion. I just added it to my swaptree list. <img src='http://d15f3663zqp4d2.cloudfront.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rm</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/quantitative-investment-strategies-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-1251</link>
		<dc:creator>rm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 03:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=2481#comment-1251</guid>
		<description>Overall, quant strategies are just as impossible as most any other strategy of trying to consistently beat the market over a significant period of time. While markets aren&#039;t entirely random, they&#039;re nearly close enough to make prediction intractable. A great book is Mandelbrot&#039;s &quot;Misbehavior of Markets.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overall, quant strategies are just as impossible as most any other strategy of trying to consistently beat the market over a significant period of time. While markets aren&#8217;t entirely random, they&#8217;re nearly close enough to make prediction intractable. A great book is Mandelbrot&#8217;s &#8220;Misbehavior of Markets.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/quantitative-investment-strategies-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-1248</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=2481#comment-1248</guid>
		<description>Hi Kevin.

As much as I argued with it, thank you for bringing up that article. I found it pretty interesting indeed.

And I couldn&#039;t agree more with your statement that investors should know exactly what they&#039;re investing in--whether it&#039;s an index fund, active fund, or otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kevin.</p>
<p>As much as I argued with it, thank you for bringing up that article. I found it pretty interesting indeed.</p>
<p>And I couldn&#8217;t agree more with your statement that investors should know exactly what they&#8217;re investing in&#8211;whether it&#8217;s an index fund, active fund, or otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/quantitative-investment-strategies-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-1247</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=2481#comment-1247</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Mike, for the response.

I think your point about a quantitative system being just a slightly more sophisticated version of an active fund rings very true.

I guess I found the other beginning of the Fool article an interesting thing to bring up - that investors should still understand how an index fund actually divides your investment before you run off and make assumptions about its diversification.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Mike, for the response.</p>
<p>I think your point about a quantitative system being just a slightly more sophisticated version of an active fund rings very true.</p>
<p>I guess I found the other beginning of the Fool article an interesting thing to bring up &#8211; that investors should still understand how an index fund actually divides your investment before you run off and make assumptions about its diversification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/quantitative-investment-strategies-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-1242</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=2481#comment-1242</guid>
		<description>Yeah, the only reason I was picking on quantitative funds in particular is that I was asked specifically what I thought of that one article.

As you know, I&#039;m fairly skeptical about the value provided by &lt;i&gt;any&lt;/i&gt; active fund.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the only reason I was picking on quantitative funds in particular is that I was asked specifically what I thought of that one article.</p>
<p>As you know, I&#8217;m fairly skeptical about the value provided by <i>any</i> active fund.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Curmudgeon</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/quantitative-investment-strategies-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-1241</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Curmudgeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=2481#comment-1241</guid>
		<description>Quantitative investing is just another flavor of active investing.  It&#039;s historically been lower fee than the traditionally run active funds only because those silly quants started out charging less.

Other than the fees, quant funds are just like any active fund from the investor&#039;s point of view, and everything you say about them applies to active funds in general: higher cost, no guarantee that past performance will continue, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quantitative investing is just another flavor of active investing.  It&#8217;s historically been lower fee than the traditionally run active funds only because those silly quants started out charging less.</p>
<p>Other than the fees, quant funds are just like any active fund from the investor&#8217;s point of view, and everything you say about them applies to active funds in general: higher cost, no guarantee that past performance will continue, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching using disk
Object Caching 283/325 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: Amazon Web Services: S3: d15f3663zqp4d2.cloudfront.net

Served from: www.obliviousinvestor.com @ 2010-09-08 08:28:20 -->