<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Investment Volatility vs. Portfolio Volatility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/investment-volatility-vs-portfolio-volatility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/investment-volatility-vs-portfolio-volatility/</link>
	<description>Investing Blog: The Oblivious Investor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:54:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Monevator</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/investment-volatility-vs-portfolio-volatility/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Monevator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 08:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=452#comment-88</guid>
		<description>Another problem is for obvious psychological reasons, people typically come to asset allocation at exactly the wrong time. We&#039;re reading a lot about it now (I don&#039;t mean here, I mean in general in the blogosphere/media) because it&#039;s clear if you were 50% in bonds/cash or whatever, you&#039;d be well up versus someone 100% in stocks, given the market falls.

But if you&#039;re going to suddenly embrace diversity in your portfolio you should do it when the high return class has enjoyed several years of growth, not when it&#039;s depressed. i.e. 2000 or 2007.

(And then maintain your asset allocation going forward, and try not to be too clever, of course! :) )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another problem is for obvious psychological reasons, people typically come to asset allocation at exactly the wrong time. We&#8217;re reading a lot about it now (I don&#8217;t mean here, I mean in general in the blogosphere/media) because it&#8217;s clear if you were 50% in bonds/cash or whatever, you&#8217;d be well up versus someone 100% in stocks, given the market falls.</p>
<p>But if you&#8217;re going to suddenly embrace diversity in your portfolio you should do it when the high return class has enjoyed several years of growth, not when it&#8217;s depressed. i.e. 2000 or 2007.</p>
<p>(And then maintain your asset allocation going forward, and try not to be too clever, of course! <img src='http://d15f3663zqp4d2.cloudfront.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: Amazon Web Services: S3: d15f3663zqp4d2.cloudfront.net

Served from: www.obliviousinvestor.com @ 2010-07-30 02:58:48 -->