<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Choose ETFs for Your Portfolio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/how-to-choose-etfs-for-your-portfolio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/how-to-choose-etfs-for-your-portfolio/</link>
	<description>Investing Blog: The Oblivious Investor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:54:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Monevator</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/how-to-choose-etfs-for-your-portfolio/comment-page-1/#comment-4605</link>
		<dc:creator>Monevator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=5400#comment-4605</guid>
		<description>We can only dream of those low total expense ratios here in Europe. The lowest from memory that retail investors can access is the Fidelity Moneybuilder, but even that has a TER of 0.2% if I recall correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can only dream of those low total expense ratios here in Europe. The lowest from memory that retail investors can access is the Fidelity Moneybuilder, but even that has a TER of 0.2% if I recall correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/how-to-choose-etfs-for-your-portfolio/comment-page-1/#comment-4603</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 02:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=5400#comment-4603</guid>
		<description>Daddy Paul: Large-cap domestic stock ETFs typically have low expense ratios (though they&#039;re not all as low as these 4). In other categories, expense ratios can be much higher. For example, many emerging markets ETFs or sector-specific ETFs have expense ratios close to 1%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daddy Paul: Large-cap domestic stock ETFs typically have low expense ratios (though they&#8217;re not all as low as these 4). In other categories, expense ratios can be much higher. For example, many emerging markets ETFs or sector-specific ETFs have expense ratios close to 1%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daddy Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/how-to-choose-etfs-for-your-portfolio/comment-page-1/#comment-4602</link>
		<dc:creator>Daddy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 00:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=5400#comment-4602</guid>
		<description>Mike
 All of the funds listed have low expenses. Just how high are some expenses on  some ETF&#039;s?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike<br />
 All of the funds listed have low expenses. Just how high are some expenses on  some ETF&#8217;s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/how-to-choose-etfs-for-your-portfolio/comment-page-1/#comment-4563</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=5400#comment-4563</guid>
		<description>Hi Meghan.

The spread is simply the difference between the &quot;bid&quot; and the &quot;ask&quot; if you look up a ticker symbol online. For example, &lt;a href=&quot;http://finance.yahoo.com/q?d=t&amp;s=IVV&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;looking up IVV on Yahoo Finance&lt;/a&gt; shows us that (at the moment) the bid is $115.41, and the ask is $115.51, thereby making the spread $0.10.

But when comparing ETFs, it&#039;s more meaningful to look at the spread as a percentage of the total price rather than as a dollar amount. So for the moment, the spread would be 0.087% of the ask price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Meghan.</p>
<p>The spread is simply the difference between the &#8220;bid&#8221; and the &#8220;ask&#8221; if you look up a ticker symbol online. For example, <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?d=t&#038;s=IVV" rel="nofollow">looking up IVV on Yahoo Finance</a> shows us that (at the moment) the bid is $115.41, and the ask is $115.51, thereby making the spread $0.10.</p>
<p>But when comparing ETFs, it&#8217;s more meaningful to look at the spread as a percentage of the total price rather than as a dollar amount. So for the moment, the spread would be 0.087% of the ask price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meghan</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/how-to-choose-etfs-for-your-portfolio/comment-page-1/#comment-4562</link>
		<dc:creator>Meghan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 02:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=5400#comment-4562</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike, 

This is a very useful post. I&#039;m wondering, how do you calculate the bid/ask spread? This is something that I find tends to be ignored in articles on ETFs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike, </p>
<p>This is a very useful post. I&#8217;m wondering, how do you calculate the bid/ask spread? This is something that I find tends to be ignored in articles on ETFs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/how-to-choose-etfs-for-your-portfolio/comment-page-1/#comment-4552</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 00:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=5400#comment-4552</guid>
		<description>Capt. Mike:

The spread won&#039;t always be as small as it happens to be with these 4 particular ETFs, so it&#039;s worth at least looking into beforehand. But you&#039;re absolutely correct in that, if you&#039;re investing for an extended period of time, it certainly has smaller impact than, say, the expense ratio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Capt. Mike:</p>
<p>The spread won&#8217;t always be as small as it happens to be with these 4 particular ETFs, so it&#8217;s worth at least looking into beforehand. But you&#8217;re absolutely correct in that, if you&#8217;re investing for an extended period of time, it certainly has smaller impact than, say, the expense ratio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capt. Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/how-to-choose-etfs-for-your-portfolio/comment-page-1/#comment-4551</link>
		<dc:creator>Capt. Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 00:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=5400#comment-4551</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike,
Good article. I guess I dont understand the importance of the small bid/ask spread. If you are investing for the long haul, not trading the ETF and having dividends reinvested why does bid/ask spread matter?
Kind regards, Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike,<br />
Good article. I guess I dont understand the importance of the small bid/ask spread. If you are investing for the long haul, not trading the ETF and having dividends reinvested why does bid/ask spread matter?<br />
Kind regards, Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RetirementInvestingToday</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/how-to-choose-etfs-for-your-portfolio/comment-page-1/#comment-4549</link>
		<dc:creator>RetirementInvestingToday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=5400#comment-4549</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m always impressed by how low the Expense Ratios are for ETF&#039;s in the US.  Here in the UK we are being continually ripped off.

You give the example of IVV having an expense ratio of 0.09%.  Here in the UK the iShares equivalent, a basic FTSE 100 ETF, has an expense ratio (TER) of 0.4%!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m always impressed by how low the Expense Ratios are for ETF&#8217;s in the US.  Here in the UK we are being continually ripped off.</p>
<p>You give the example of IVV having an expense ratio of 0.09%.  Here in the UK the iShares equivalent, a basic FTSE 100 ETF, has an expense ratio (TER) of 0.4%!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/how-to-choose-etfs-for-your-portfolio/comment-page-1/#comment-4547</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=5400#comment-4547</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;Can a fund company increase the spread artificially as sort of a hidden load?&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

To the best of my knowledge, no. My understanding is that the spread doesn&#039;t go to the fund company but rather to the party that executes the transaction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>Can a fund company increase the spread artificially as sort of a hidden load?</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>To the best of my knowledge, no. My understanding is that the spread doesn&#8217;t go to the fund company but rather to the party that executes the transaction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Francis</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/how-to-choose-etfs-for-your-portfolio/comment-page-1/#comment-4546</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=5400#comment-4546</guid>
		<description>Mike,

Thanks for outlining your selection process- I have to admit that I&#039;ve tended to ignore the bid/ask spread as a factor but it could be a tie breaker between two funds.  
I found vanguard&#039;s summary for their funds:
https://institutional.vanguard.com/VGApp/iip/site/institutional/investments/bidaskspread
I know it should be related to the trading volume and frequently traded stocks have a lower spread.  
Can a fund company increase the spread artificially as sort of a hidden load?  

-Rick Francis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>Thanks for outlining your selection process- I have to admit that I&#8217;ve tended to ignore the bid/ask spread as a factor but it could be a tie breaker between two funds.<br />
I found vanguard&#8217;s summary for their funds:<br />
<a href="https://institutional.vanguard.com/VGApp/iip/site/institutional/investments/bidaskspread" rel="nofollow">https://institutional.vanguard.com/VGApp/iip/site/institutional/investments/bidaskspread</a><br />
I know it should be related to the trading volume and frequently traded stocks have a lower spread.<br />
Can a fund company increase the spread artificially as sort of a hidden load?  </p>
<p>-Rick Francis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: Amazon Web Services: S3: d15f3663zqp4d2.cloudfront.net

Served from: www.obliviousinvestor.com @ 2010-07-30 02:45:38 -->