<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Greater Volatility = Greater Returns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/greater-volatility-greater-returns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/greater-volatility-greater-returns/</link>
	<description>Index Investing: The Oblivious Investor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:57:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Singapore Recession</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/greater-volatility-greater-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Singapore Recession</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=359#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Thanks for clarifying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for clarifying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/greater-volatility-greater-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=359#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Hi SR. Thanks for commenting and tip&#039;ing. :)

You make valid points. I was, however, actually basing the article on an entirely different assumption: That the investor is DCAing into a diversified mutual fund (index or otherwise), rather than into an individual stock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi SR. Thanks for commenting and tip&#8217;ing. <img src='http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>You make valid points. I was, however, actually basing the article on an entirely different assumption: That the investor is DCAing into a diversified mutual fund (index or otherwise), rather than into an individual stock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Singapore Recession</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/greater-volatility-greater-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Singapore Recession</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=359#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Hi, 

Thanks for the great post! I have Tip&#039;d!

However, I think it is necessary for you to point out clearly, to newbie investor readers out there, that the purpose for this post is to purely show that volatility is actually good for dollar cost averaging strategy with the following assumptions:
 
1. the company does not go into credit default
2. the company&#039;s share price continue to grow higher forever
3. the investor know when to take profit
4. This is only one of the factor and by no mean the only factor to improve the investment
5. DCA forever regardless of market condition

The reason is because, imagine if you have use DCA strategy on Citi or AIG ... how would your investment looks like if you have started investing 10 years? -75% 

just my 2 cents :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, </p>
<p>Thanks for the great post! I have Tip&#8217;d!</p>
<p>However, I think it is necessary for you to point out clearly, to newbie investor readers out there, that the purpose for this post is to purely show that volatility is actually good for dollar cost averaging strategy with the following assumptions:</p>
<p>1. the company does not go into credit default<br />
2. the company&#8217;s share price continue to grow higher forever<br />
3. the investor know when to take profit<br />
4. This is only one of the factor and by no mean the only factor to improve the investment<br />
5. DCA forever regardless of market condition</p>
<p>The reason is because, imagine if you have use DCA strategy on Citi or AIG &#8230; how would your investment looks like if you have started investing 10 years? -75% </p>
<p>just my 2 cents <img src='http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Williams @ Crackerjack Greenback</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/greater-volatility-greater-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Williams @ Crackerjack Greenback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 16:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=359#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Good job on explaining one of the key benefits of DCA, Mike!  There are a lot of naysayers out there, but you just can&#039;t beat the simplicity and strength of a good DCA plan.  Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job on explaining one of the key benefits of DCA, Mike!  There are a lot of naysayers out there, but you just can&#8217;t beat the simplicity and strength of a good DCA plan.  Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
