Oblivious Investor http://www.obliviousinvestor.com Low-Maintenance Investing with Index Funds and ETFs Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:00:40 +0000 en-US hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.3 How Do Capital Loss Carryovers Work? http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/how-do-capital-loss-carryovers-work/ http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/how-do-capital-loss-carryovers-work/#comments Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:00:40 +0000 http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=7241 A reader writes in, asking:

“I just read your article on capital gains and losses. I understand that up to $3,000 of a net capital loss can be used to offset ordinary income in a year, and the rest is carried over to use in future years, but I am unsure of whether the carryover is short-term or long-term. For example, if I have the following for one year:

$ 4,000 in STCL
$ 6,000 in LTCL
$10,000 in losses
-$ 3,000 writeoff against ordinary income
$ 7,000 capital loss carryover

Is the $7,000 carryover considered a short-term or long-term capital loss? Or is it divided on a pro-rata basis, such that there would be a carryover of $2,800 STCL and $4,200 LTCL?”

For questions of this nature, it’s often helpful to look at the tax forms themselves, to see how the numbers flow from one line to the next (and from one form to the next). In this case, doing an example run through Schedule D, using the “Capital Loss Carryover Worksheet” from Schedule D’s instructions can give you a good idea of how this all works.

The short answer is that the $3,000 that is deducted from ordinary income comes first from STCLs to the extent possible, then from LTCLs. Then the remaining losses retain their character when carried over for the next year.

So, if the numbers in your example were a taxpayer’s numbers for 2013, when that taxpayer filled out his Schedule D for 2014, he would have a $1,000 STCL carryover ($4,000 STCL, minus the $3,000 that had been used in 2013 to offset ordinary income) and a $6,000 LTCL carryover.

Alternatively, if the taxpayer’s 2013 numbers were as follows:

$ 2,000 in STCL
$ 6,000 in LTCL
$8,000 in losses
-$ 3,000 writeoff
$ 5,000 capital loss carryover

The entire $2,000 of STCL would be used up for the deduction, and the capital loss carryover for 2014 would be considered entirely long-term capital loss.

Interested in economics? Pick up a copy of my latest book:

Microeconomics Made Simple: Basic Microeconomic Principles Explained in 100 Pages or Less

Disclaimer: Your subscription to this blog does not create a CPA-client or other professional services relationship between you and Mike Piper or between you and Simple Subjects, LLC. By subscribing, you explicitly agree not to hold Mike Piper or Simple Subjects, LLC liable in any way for damages arising from decisions you make based on the information available herein. Neither Mike Piper nor Simple Subjects, LLC makes any warranty as to the accuracy of any information contained in this communication. I am not a financial or investment advisor, and the information contained herein is for informational and entertainment purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. On financial matters for which assistance is needed, I strongly urge you to meet with a professional advisor who (unlike me) has a professional relationship with you and who (again, unlike me) knows the relevant details of your situation.

You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of this email (or by removing this RSS feed from your feed reader if you have subscribed via a feed reader).

]]>
http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/how-do-capital-loss-carryovers-work/feed/ 0
Investing Blog Roundup: Retiring Baby Boomers http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/investing-blog-roundup-retiring-baby-boomers/ http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/investing-blog-roundup-retiring-baby-boomers/#comments Fri, 25 Jul 2014 12:00:17 +0000 http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=7259 This week, author/advisor Larry Swedroe provided an excellent answer to a question I see from time to time: Should we fear a stock crash as a result of baby boomers retiring and selling off their shares?

Swedroe writes:

“We’ll begin by pointing out that only unexpected events have an impact on stock prices. And if anything can be forecasted, it’s demographic data. You can be certain that investors in general are well aware of this trend, and thus have incorporated that knowledge and the expected effect of retirees’ equity sales into current prices.”

Investing Articles

Thanks for reading!

Interested in economics? Pick up a copy of my latest book:

Microeconomics Made Simple: Basic Microeconomic Principles Explained in 100 Pages or Less

Disclaimer: Your subscription to this blog does not create a CPA-client or other professional services relationship between you and Mike Piper or between you and Simple Subjects, LLC. By subscribing, you explicitly agree not to hold Mike Piper or Simple Subjects, LLC liable in any way for damages arising from decisions you make based on the information available herein. Neither Mike Piper nor Simple Subjects, LLC makes any warranty as to the accuracy of any information contained in this communication. I am not a financial or investment advisor, and the information contained herein is for informational and entertainment purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. On financial matters for which assistance is needed, I strongly urge you to meet with a professional advisor who (unlike me) has a professional relationship with you and who (again, unlike me) knows the relevant details of your situation.

You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of this email (or by removing this RSS feed from your feed reader if you have subscribed via a feed reader).

]]>
http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/investing-blog-roundup-retiring-baby-boomers/feed/ 0
Which Year’s Income Determines Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare”) Subsidy Eligibility? http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/which-years-income-determines-affordable-care-act-obamacare-subsidy-eligibility/ http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/which-years-income-determines-affordable-care-act-obamacare-subsidy-eligibility/#comments Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:00:24 +0000 http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=7254 A reader writes in, asking:

“I’m trying to find more info on ACA premium subsidies. Specifically, I want to understand which year’s MAGI [modified adjusted gross income] is used. For example, would a person’s health insurance premiums for 2015 be determined based upon his 2014 MAGI or 2013 MAGI, etc.?”

The premium tax credit (i.e., the subsidy that reduces premiums) works like any other credit in that it is your income in a given year that determines the size (if any) of the credit for which you are ultimately eligible in that year. For example, your 2014 “household income” (defined here) is what will determine the size of the credit for which you are eligible in 2014.

What is unique about the premium tax credit, however, is that it can be claimed in advance. The applications for coverage ask for an estimate of your annual income, and if your estimate is such that it would make you eligible for a credit, you can take that credit in advance in the form of lower monthly premiums.

But, when it comes time to file your tax return for the year (e.g., April 2015 for your 2014 return), you effectively “settle up.” If your income ends up being lower than you had estimated, and you are therefore eligible for a larger credit than you received in advance, you can receive the remainder of the credit when you file your return.

Conversely, if your income ended up being higher than you had estimated, you have to pay back the excess credit that you received in advance. There are, however, some limitations on the amount you would have to pay back. Specifically, if your “household income” for the year ends up being:

  • Less than 200% of the federal poverty level, the amount you could have to pay back is limited to $600 ($300 if you’re single),
  • 200-299% of the federal poverty level, the amount you could have to pay back is limited to $1,500 ($750 if single), and
  • 300-399% of the federal poverty level, the amount you could have to pay back is limited to $2,500 ($1,250 if single).

If your household income for the year ends up being greater than (or equal to) 400% of the federal poverty level, you would have to pay back the entire amount of any excess credit you received in advance. (Note: The dollar amounts above will be adjusted for inflation, beginning in 2015.)

Of note, however, is the fact that there is no provision for “settling up” with regard to the cost sharing subsidies (i.e., the subsidies that reduce your deductible, out of pocket maximum, etc.). They too are initially based on the income estimate that you provide when applying for coverage, but they are not corrected retroactively if your estimate ends up being off target. (Of course, even ignoring any ethical qualms, you wouldn’t want to intentionally lie in order to get a larger subsidy, given that section 1411(h) of the PPACA provides for penalties of up to $250,000 for “knowingly and willfully providing false or fraudulent information” when applying for coverage.)

In the event that it becomes clear that your actual income for the year is going to be significantly different from the estimate you provided (e.g., due to a change in job status or marital status), you must inform the insurance exchange as to your change in circumstances, and they will adjust any subsidies you are receiving accordingly going forward.

Interested in economics? Pick up a copy of my latest book:

Microeconomics Made Simple: Basic Microeconomic Principles Explained in 100 Pages or Less

Disclaimer: Your subscription to this blog does not create a CPA-client or other professional services relationship between you and Mike Piper or between you and Simple Subjects, LLC. By subscribing, you explicitly agree not to hold Mike Piper or Simple Subjects, LLC liable in any way for damages arising from decisions you make based on the information available herein. Neither Mike Piper nor Simple Subjects, LLC makes any warranty as to the accuracy of any information contained in this communication. I am not a financial or investment advisor, and the information contained herein is for informational and entertainment purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. On financial matters for which assistance is needed, I strongly urge you to meet with a professional advisor who (unlike me) has a professional relationship with you and who (again, unlike me) knows the relevant details of your situation.

You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of this email (or by removing this RSS feed from your feed reader if you have subscribed via a feed reader).

]]>
http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/which-years-income-determines-affordable-care-act-obamacare-subsidy-eligibility/feed/ 0
Investing Blog Roundup: Index Fund Securities Lending http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/investing-blog-roundup-index-fund-securities-lending/ http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/investing-blog-roundup-index-fund-securities-lending/#comments Fri, 18 Jul 2014 12:00:13 +0000 http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=7252 One question readers ask from time to time is how many Vanguard index funds manage to trail their index by an amount less than the fund’s expense ratio. To some extent, the answer is pure randomness. An index fund doesn’t typically hold every security in the index, in exactly the designated proportion, at every moment in time.

Another part of the answer, however, is that the funds earn some money from securities lending. Barry Barnitz has more on that topic on the Bogleheads Blog this week:

Investing Articles

Other Money-Related Articles

Thanks for reading!

Interested in economics? Pick up a copy of my latest book:

Microeconomics Made Simple: Basic Microeconomic Principles Explained in 100 Pages or Less

Disclaimer: Your subscription to this blog does not create a CPA-client or other professional services relationship between you and Mike Piper or between you and Simple Subjects, LLC. By subscribing, you explicitly agree not to hold Mike Piper or Simple Subjects, LLC liable in any way for damages arising from decisions you make based on the information available herein. Neither Mike Piper nor Simple Subjects, LLC makes any warranty as to the accuracy of any information contained in this communication. I am not a financial or investment advisor, and the information contained herein is for informational and entertainment purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. On financial matters for which assistance is needed, I strongly urge you to meet with a professional advisor who (unlike me) has a professional relationship with you and who (again, unlike me) knows the relevant details of your situation.

You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of this email (or by removing this RSS feed from your feed reader if you have subscribed via a feed reader).

]]>
http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/investing-blog-roundup-index-fund-securities-lending/feed/ 0
What is a Qualifying Longevity Annuity Contract (QLAC)? http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/qualifying-longevity-annuity-contract-qlac/ http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/qualifying-longevity-annuity-contract-qlac/#comments Mon, 14 Jul 2014 11:00:40 +0000 http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=7246 I’ve been getting a lot of questions about the Treasury Department’s recent release of final regulations that create a new type of annuity in the tax law: “Qualifying Longevity Annuity Contracts” (QLACs).

To explain, we first need to back up a step. This isn’t really a new type of annuity. This is simply a new tax treatment for types of annuities that already exist (specifically, certain types of deferred annuities) when they are purchased inside tax-deferred IRAs or tax-deferred employer-sponsored retirement plans.

Deferred Lifetime Annuities in General

A basic deferred lifetime annuity works like this:

  • You pay a lump sum premium now (e.g., at age 65) to an insurance company, then
  • Starting at a specific age in the future (e.g., age 85) the insurance company begins paying you a specific amount of money every month, and they continue to do so for the rest of your life.

In other words, these are much like the immediate lifetime annuities we often talk about here on the blog, except for the fact that the income doesn’t kick in for many years (hence, “deferred lifetime annuity”). And, because the payments don’t kick in for several years, the premium is much lower for a given level of income.

For example, as of this writing, for a 65-year-old female to purchase an immediate lifetime annuity paying $1,000 per month, the premium would be $180,384. In contrast, for a 65-year-old female to purchase a deferred lifetime annuity, for which payments begin at age 85, paying $1,000 per month, the premium would be $24,740. (These quotes are coming from the Income Solutions website.)

If deferred annuities of this nature have no appeal to you, then you do not need to worry about these new rules.

Effect of the New Regulations

Generally, with a traditional IRA or 401(k), you have to start taking required minimum distributions (RMDs) soon after reaching age 70.5. Thus, prior to the new rules, if you purchased a deferred lifetime annuity within your traditional IRA that pays nothing until, say, age 80, you could have a problem. The annuity is not liquid, so you might end up in a situation in which the liquid IRA balance is not sufficient to satisfy your RMD.

Now, this is no longer a concern. Under the new rule, as long as the annuity meets the requirements to be a “qualifying longevity annuity contract,” the value of the annuity would not be included in the value of your IRA — or 401(k) or other similar account — when calculating your RMD.

Requirements to be a QLAC

A deferred annuity must meet several requirements to be considered a QLAC.

First, payments must start no later than the first day of the month after the month in which you reach age 85.

Second, the annuity must not be variable annuity or “indexed annuity” (i.e., equity indexed annuity/fixed index annuity).

Third, the annuity cannot have much in the way of bells and whistles. Optional riders that would be allowed include:

  • Inflation adjustments,
  • Survivor benefits to a designated beneficiary, provided they meet a few specific requirements (e.g., in most cases the benefit to the survivor cannot be greater than the payments that were being made to the original owner), and
  • A “return of premium” rider, wherein upon the death of the original owner, the designated beneficiary receives an amount equal to the premium(s) paid, minus any amount that has been paid out so far.

Finally, there are some dollar limits to be aware of:

  • The total premium(s) paid for your QLAC(s) must not exceed $125,000,
  • The total premium(s) paid for your QLAC(s) in IRAs (not including annuities in Roth IRAs) cannot exceed 25% of your total IRA balances (not including Roth IRAs), with IRA balances being measured as of 12/31 of the prior calendar year, and
  • The total premium(s) paid for QLAC(s) in an employer-sponsored retirement plan cannot exceed 25% of your account balance in that plan.

Interested in economics? Pick up a copy of my latest book:

Microeconomics Made Simple: Basic Microeconomic Principles Explained in 100 Pages or Less

Disclaimer: Your subscription to this blog does not create a CPA-client or other professional services relationship between you and Mike Piper or between you and Simple Subjects, LLC. By subscribing, you explicitly agree not to hold Mike Piper or Simple Subjects, LLC liable in any way for damages arising from decisions you make based on the information available herein. Neither Mike Piper nor Simple Subjects, LLC makes any warranty as to the accuracy of any information contained in this communication. I am not a financial or investment advisor, and the information contained herein is for informational and entertainment purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. On financial matters for which assistance is needed, I strongly urge you to meet with a professional advisor who (unlike me) has a professional relationship with you and who (again, unlike me) knows the relevant details of your situation.

You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of this email (or by removing this RSS feed from your feed reader if you have subscribed via a feed reader).

]]>
http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/qualifying-longevity-annuity-contract-qlac/feed/ 0
Investing Blog Roundup: Investment-Induced Panic http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/investing-blog-roundup-investment-induced-panic/ http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/investing-blog-roundup-investment-induced-panic/#comments Fri, 11 Jul 2014 12:00:09 +0000 http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=7249 This week, I especially enjoyed a MarketWatch article from Mitchell Tuchman pointing out a number of errors investors often make. This little gem stood out to me in particular:

“Your long-term investments shouldn’t be allocated in a way that pressures you to review them constantly. That’s not investing. It’s a slow-motion form of panic.”

Investing Articles

Thanks for reading!

Interested in economics? Pick up a copy of my latest book:

Microeconomics Made Simple: Basic Microeconomic Principles Explained in 100 Pages or Less

Disclaimer: Your subscription to this blog does not create a CPA-client or other professional services relationship between you and Mike Piper or between you and Simple Subjects, LLC. By subscribing, you explicitly agree not to hold Mike Piper or Simple Subjects, LLC liable in any way for damages arising from decisions you make based on the information available herein. Neither Mike Piper nor Simple Subjects, LLC makes any warranty as to the accuracy of any information contained in this communication. I am not a financial or investment advisor, and the information contained herein is for informational and entertainment purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. On financial matters for which assistance is needed, I strongly urge you to meet with a professional advisor who (unlike me) has a professional relationship with you and who (again, unlike me) knows the relevant details of your situation.

You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of this email (or by removing this RSS feed from your feed reader if you have subscribed via a feed reader).

]]>
http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/investing-blog-roundup-investment-induced-panic/feed/ 0
Roth vs Tax-Deferred: Should I Look At Marginal or Effective Tax Rate? http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/roth-vs-tax-deferred-should-i-look-at-marginal-or-effective-tax-rate/ http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/roth-vs-tax-deferred-should-i-look-at-marginal-or-effective-tax-rate/#comments Mon, 07 Jul 2014 12:00:03 +0000 http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=7244 A reader writes in, asking:

“When choosing between a Roth 401k and regular 401k, people always talk about marginal tax rate. Does effective tax rate play into the decision as well? I expect to have a very low effective tax rate in retirement due to a lower income level and the tax advantaged nature of Social Security. Is that a point in favor of using a regular 401k rather than Roth?”

For those who are unfamiliar with the terms: Your “effective tax rate” is the average tax rate on all of your dollars of income within a given year (i.e., total tax, divided by total income). In contrast, your “marginal tax rate” refers to how much additional tax you would have to pay on an additional amount of income (i.e., additional tax, divided by additional income).

To answer the reader’s question, no, your effective tax rate doesn’t really play into the Roth-vs-tax-deferred decision. Your marginal tax rate (i.e., the tax rate on only the dollars of income in question) is what matters here.

This is, by the way, a general rule about economic decisions — they’re made at the margin. That is, we want to know, “if I make decision X, how will [something] change?”

  • If I sell more units, how does my revenue change (i.e., what is my marginal revenue)?
  • If I produce more units, how do my costs change (i.e., what is my marginal cost of production)?
  • If I buy more of this product, how does my happiness change (i.e., what is the marginal utility of this product)?

And when it comes to retirement accounts, we want to know: If I contribute to a tax-deferred account (as opposed to a Roth account), how does the amount of tax I have to pay this year change, and how does the amount of tax I have to pay in the future change when I take money out of the account? Marginal, not effective, tax rates are what answer these questions.

That said, there are a few important points that need clarification, as there’s more to the question of marginal tax rates than just, “what tax bracket am I in now, and what tax bracket will I be in later?”

First, it is important to account for the fact that there can be multiple applicable marginal tax rates within a given year, if the deduction/income in question would push you under/over a given threshold.

Second, it’s important to remember that your marginal tax rate is not necessarily the same as your tax bracket. For example, due to the way in which Social Security is taxed, it’s very common for retirees to have a marginal tax rate that is significantly greater than the tax bracket they’re in.

Finally, it’s important to note that it’s quite difficult to accurately predict your marginal tax rate decades into the future. This is, in itself, a good reason to hedge your bets by making sure that you have some money in Roth accounts and some money in tax-deferred accounts.

Interested in economics? Pick up a copy of my latest book:

Microeconomics Made Simple: Basic Microeconomic Principles Explained in 100 Pages or Less

Disclaimer: Your subscription to this blog does not create a CPA-client or other professional services relationship between you and Mike Piper or between you and Simple Subjects, LLC. By subscribing, you explicitly agree not to hold Mike Piper or Simple Subjects, LLC liable in any way for damages arising from decisions you make based on the information available herein. Neither Mike Piper nor Simple Subjects, LLC makes any warranty as to the accuracy of any information contained in this communication. I am not a financial or investment advisor, and the information contained herein is for informational and entertainment purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. On financial matters for which assistance is needed, I strongly urge you to meet with a professional advisor who (unlike me) has a professional relationship with you and who (again, unlike me) knows the relevant details of your situation.

You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of this email (or by removing this RSS feed from your feed reader if you have subscribed via a feed reader).

]]>
http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/roth-vs-tax-deferred-should-i-look-at-marginal-or-effective-tax-rate/feed/ 0
Investing Blog Roundup: The Downside of Short-Term Bonds http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/investing-blog-roundup-your-retirement-number/ http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/investing-blog-roundup-your-retirement-number/#comments Fri, 04 Jul 2014 12:00:55 +0000 http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=7245 There’s no denying that interest rates are low right now. But that fact is not, in itself, a reason to think that rates are going up any time soon.

Using short-term bonds in your portfolio (rather than intermediate-term bonds) does indeed reduce the size of the loss you’ll incur whenever interest rates do rise. But, as Rick Ferri reminds us this week, using short-term bonds is not a clear “win,” given that you’ll be collecting less interest while you wait for rates to rise. And you could be waiting a very long time.

Investing Articles

Other Money-Related Articles

Thanks for reading!

Interested in economics? Pick up a copy of my latest book:

Microeconomics Made Simple: Basic Microeconomic Principles Explained in 100 Pages or Less

Disclaimer: Your subscription to this blog does not create a CPA-client or other professional services relationship between you and Mike Piper or between you and Simple Subjects, LLC. By subscribing, you explicitly agree not to hold Mike Piper or Simple Subjects, LLC liable in any way for damages arising from decisions you make based on the information available herein. Neither Mike Piper nor Simple Subjects, LLC makes any warranty as to the accuracy of any information contained in this communication. I am not a financial or investment advisor, and the information contained herein is for informational and entertainment purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. On financial matters for which assistance is needed, I strongly urge you to meet with a professional advisor who (unlike me) has a professional relationship with you and who (again, unlike me) knows the relevant details of your situation.

You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of this email (or by removing this RSS feed from your feed reader if you have subscribed via a feed reader).

]]>
http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/investing-blog-roundup-your-retirement-number/feed/ 0
More to Risk Tolerance Than Just Age http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/more-to-risk-tolerance-than-just-age/ http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/more-to-risk-tolerance-than-just-age/#comments Mon, 30 Jun 2014 12:00:05 +0000 http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=7234 A reader writes in, asking:

“One thing I don’t understand about target date funds is the implicit assumption that the only thing that should determine your asset allocation is how old you are. Doesn’t this seem like an obvious mistake?”

I’m not sure I’d say it’s a mistake how target date funds are constructed. But I absolutely agree that there’s more to risk tolerance and asset allocation than just the year in which you plan to retire.

For example, how stable is your income? A person with a secure, steady-paying job can take on more risk than a person with a job that could be lost at any minute or a person with a job that pays entirely based on commission.

What other assets do you have? If you have a very large emergency fund that you’re not counting as part of your portfolio, you can take on more risk in the portfolio than somebody with a smaller emergency fund.

What other assets would you have access to, if the need arose? Consider two young investors. One comes from a poor family and knows with 100% certainty that she wouldn’t be able to get any sort of financial assistance from friends or family if she lost her job. The other comes from an upper middle class background and knows that the Bank of Mom and Dad would chip in (at least to some extent) if a financial emergency came up. All else being equal, these two investors have very different levels of risk tolerance.

How much investing experience do you have? Have you been through a bear market before? Until you’ve experienced one, you should assume that it will feel worse than you’d naturally expect. If your portfolio is small relative to the size of your total available assets and you can therefore afford to make a mistake (e.g., sell out at or near the bottom in the event that you can’t handle the stress), then go ahead and build a high-risk portfolio. But if selling out would be a problem and you’ve never been through a bear market, you should probably consider a less risky allocation.

Do you have any need for the higher expected returns that come from a risky portfolio? For example, author/advisor Larry Swedroe has often written that he has a “low marginal utility of wealth” (marginal utility being the additional happiness you would get from more of the item in question), meaning that he has little to gain from a high-risk portfolio. Or, as Bill Bernstein puts it, ”if you’ve won the game, why keep playing?”

Target Retirement Funds and Risk Tolerance

Due to all of the above factors, an investor might want an allocation that doesn’t vary solely with age. For example, for a young investor who has a relatively low risk tolerance and who doesn’t expect that risk tolerance to change any time soon, a fixed 60% stock, 40% bond allocation may be a good fit. But the Target Retirement funds don’t offer that option. For investors who want an allocation that doesn’t vary with age, and who still want the simplicity of an all-in-one fund, Vanguard’s LifeStrategy funds can be a good fit.

Interested in economics? Pick up a copy of my latest book:

Microeconomics Made Simple: Basic Microeconomic Principles Explained in 100 Pages or Less

Disclaimer: Your subscription to this blog does not create a CPA-client or other professional services relationship between you and Mike Piper or between you and Simple Subjects, LLC. By subscribing, you explicitly agree not to hold Mike Piper or Simple Subjects, LLC liable in any way for damages arising from decisions you make based on the information available herein. Neither Mike Piper nor Simple Subjects, LLC makes any warranty as to the accuracy of any information contained in this communication. I am not a financial or investment advisor, and the information contained herein is for informational and entertainment purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. On financial matters for which assistance is needed, I strongly urge you to meet with a professional advisor who (unlike me) has a professional relationship with you and who (again, unlike me) knows the relevant details of your situation.

You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of this email (or by removing this RSS feed from your feed reader if you have subscribed via a feed reader).

]]>
http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/more-to-risk-tolerance-than-just-age/feed/ 0
Investing Blog Roundup: Bernstein on International Bonds and More http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/investing-blog-roundup-bernstein-on-international-bonds-and-more/ http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/investing-blog-roundup-bernstein-on-international-bonds-and-more/#comments Fri, 27 Jun 2014 12:00:51 +0000 http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=7235 This week, Olly Ludwig of ETF.com has an excellent interview with Bill Bernstein about his recent book If You Can. The interview covers a range of topics from why Bernstein doesn’t recommend owning international bonds, to how he’s trying to get the message of sensible investing out to millennials.

Investing Articles

Other Money-Related Articles

Thanks for reading!

Interested in economics? Pick up a copy of my latest book:

Microeconomics Made Simple: Basic Microeconomic Principles Explained in 100 Pages or Less

Disclaimer: Your subscription to this blog does not create a CPA-client or other professional services relationship between you and Mike Piper or between you and Simple Subjects, LLC. By subscribing, you explicitly agree not to hold Mike Piper or Simple Subjects, LLC liable in any way for damages arising from decisions you make based on the information available herein. Neither Mike Piper nor Simple Subjects, LLC makes any warranty as to the accuracy of any information contained in this communication. I am not a financial or investment advisor, and the information contained herein is for informational and entertainment purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. On financial matters for which assistance is needed, I strongly urge you to meet with a professional advisor who (unlike me) has a professional relationship with you and who (again, unlike me) knows the relevant details of your situation.

You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of this email (or by removing this RSS feed from your feed reader if you have subscribed via a feed reader).

]]>
http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/investing-blog-roundup-bernstein-on-international-bonds-and-more/feed/ 0