<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Efficient Market Hypothesis: Strong, Semi-Strong, and Weak</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/efficient-market-hypothesis-strong-semi-strong-and-weak/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/efficient-market-hypothesis-strong-semi-strong-and-weak/</link>
	<description>Index Investing: The Oblivious Investor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:37:44 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Monevator</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/efficient-market-hypothesis-strong-semi-strong-and-weak/comment-page-1/#comment-4116</link>
		<dc:creator>Monevator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=5315#comment-4116</guid>
		<description>Wonderfully concise summary, Mike.

Just for completeness, re: the Semi-Strong EMH, there&#039;s a third option - you could try to invest in stocks and beat the market yourself.

I know, I know - but before I get my hat I&#039;d argue that there&#039;s benefits to this approach over picking one or more active fund managers, in that your dealing charges *may* be lower than the fund&#039;s charges (and at least they&#039;re transparent and under your control) and also you don&#039;t have to try to predict two potentially understandable things - a manager&#039;s performance AND the performance of the sort of stocks he invests in (or even a third - whether he or she is going to stick around).

Of course, a tracker fund sidesteps all of this for most people to deliver better than average results compared to funds, and only slightly worse results compared to the market. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderfully concise summary, Mike.</p>
<p>Just for completeness, re: the Semi-Strong EMH, there&#8217;s a third option &#8211; you could try to invest in stocks and beat the market yourself.</p>
<p>I know, I know &#8211; but before I get my hat I&#8217;d argue that there&#8217;s benefits to this approach over picking one or more active fund managers, in that your dealing charges *may* be lower than the fund&#8217;s charges (and at least they&#8217;re transparent and under your control) and also you don&#8217;t have to try to predict two potentially understandable things &#8211; a manager&#8217;s performance AND the performance of the sort of stocks he invests in (or even a third &#8211; whether he or she is going to stick around).</p>
<p>Of course, a tracker fund sidesteps all of this for most people to deliver better than average results compared to funds, and only slightly worse results compared to the market. <img src='http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Francis</title>
		<link>http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/efficient-market-hypothesis-strong-semi-strong-and-weak/comment-page-1/#comment-4075</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/?p=5315#comment-4075</guid>
		<description>Mike,

A good point to keep in mind is that even if the EMH models aren&#039;t a perfect model of the stock market- if it is close enough that technical analysis or fundamental analysis won&#039;t give you a real advantage then it doesn&#039;t make sense to try them.  A Random Walk Down Wall Street: The Time-Tested Strategy for Successful Investing presents that case very well.

-Rick Francis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>A good point to keep in mind is that even if the EMH models aren&#8217;t a perfect model of the stock market- if it is close enough that technical analysis or fundamental analysis won&#8217;t give you a real advantage then it doesn&#8217;t make sense to try them.  A Random Walk Down Wall Street: The Time-Tested Strategy for Successful Investing presents that case very well.</p>
<p>-Rick Francis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
