May 2010

One question I get from time to time is how Social Security or pension income should affect your asset allocation. Specifically, should it be counted as a large bond holding?

My answer: Not exactly.

Yes, Social Security and pension income are predictable in much the same way that income from a bond is. And yes, all else being equal, an investor with a pension can probably take more risk in his portfolio than an investor without a pension.

That said, there are some meaningful differences between Social Security and a giant bond holding. For example, you can’t sell your “Social Security bond.” Among other things, this means that you can’t rebalance back and forth between a “Social Security bond” and a stock fund in the same way that you could with real bond holdings.

How to Account for Social Security Income

Rather than counting Social Security income and pension income as part of your bond allocation, I’d suggest using this method for fitting them into your overall retirement plan:

  1. Determine how much money you’re going to be spending each year during retirement.
  2. From that, subtract any part-time job or business income you expect to earn.
  3. From that, subtract your Social Security and pension income to determine how much income you will need from your investments.
  4. Divide that number by the size of your portfolio to calculate your required withdrawal rate.
  5. Choose an asset allocation that you believe will best satisfy that withdrawal rate.

This way, rather than counting Social Security and your pension as liquid, tangible investments (which they aren’t), you’re counting them as income sources (which is what they are).

Social Security Bond Problems

In case you aren’t convinced, let’s take a look at how counting Social Security income as a bond could cause some problems.

Let’s imagine that you get $20,000 per year in Social Security income and $20,000 in pension income. If we were to count those income streams as bonds and we assume the bond has a 4.07% interest rate (that of a 30-year T-Bond at the moment), they’d be worth a total of $982,800.

And let’s assume that you need another $20,000 each year in addition to your social security and pension income. If you have a $450,000 portfolio, that’s a 4.44% withdrawal rate. If you retire at age 65 and use the “age in bonds” rule, you’d have the following allocation:

  • $0 in bonds; $450,000 in stocks (because social security and pension income would more than satisfy the entire bond allocation).

In other words, in such a scenario, if you count Social Security and pension income as if they were bonds, you’d be going into retirement with all of your investable assets in stocks, and you’d be using a 100% stock portfolio to satisfy a 4.44% withdrawal rate.

Yes, if things go your way and the stock market performs well when you need it to, your plan would work out OK. But it’s far from a sure bet.

Instead, count the income streams as an offset to your expenses, then ask yourself what allocation you should use to satisfy the necessary 4.44% withdrawal rate.

Retiring Soon? Pick Up a Copy of My Book:

Can I Retire Cover

Can I Retire? Managing a Retirement Portfolio Explained in 100 Pages or Less

Topics Covered in the Book:
  • How to calculate how much you’ll need saved before you can retire,
  • How to minimize the risk of outliving your money,
  • How to choose which accounts (Roth vs. traditional IRA vs. taxable) to withdraw from each year,
  • Click here to see the full list.

A Testimonial from a Reader on Amazon:

"Hands down the best overview of what it takes to truly retire that I've ever read. In jargon free English, this gem of a book nails the key issues."

May 31, 2010 6 comments

Happy Friday, everyone. :)

In an effort to bring in a little diversity, rather than linking to the same blogs week after week, I’ve added a roundup submission form. So in the future, if you have an investing-related blog post you’d like to share, please go ahead and submit it.

Investing Articles

Other Personal Finance Articles

Blog Carnivals

Thanks for reading!

May 28, 2010 4 comments

Life insurance is often thought of as something for younger investors–a way to take care of your children once you’re gone. By the time you’re retired and your children are out on their own, you don’t need life insurance anymore, do you?

Well, you might.

Will You Earn Any Income?

If you’ll be earning income during retirement (through part-time work or running a business, for instance) and somebody other than yourself will be dependent upon that income, you will need to have life insurance to provide for them in case of your death.

Similarly, if you have a pension and somebody else is dependent upon that income, you’ll need to carry life insurance–unless, of course, the dependent is your spouse and your pension provides a surviving spouse benefit that’s sufficient to cover his/her needs.

How Much Insurance Do You Need?

The goal of owning life insurance in retirement is obviously to provide enough money to allow your spouse or other dependent(s) to continue their lives without having to undergo a decline in standard of living. In many cases, the simplest and safest way to achieve this goal is to plan to buy a single premium immediate annuity that will replace the lost income.

For example, imagine that you have a pension that pays $40,000 per year, but will only pay $20,000 per year to your spouse after your death. In that case (assuming your spouse is the only other person dependent upon this income), you’d want to have enough life insurance to cover the purchase of an annuity paying $20,000 per year for the remainder of your spouse’s life.

  • Possible exception: If you think your spouse’s expenses will be significantly lower than your combined expenses, you can get away with somewhat less life insurance.

It’s worth noting that (whether you plan to buy an annuity with the insurance proceeds or not) the amount of insurance you need will decrease over time as the remaining life expectancy of your spouse–or other dependent–decreases.

In Summary

If, by the time you retire, the overwhelming majority of your financial assets are in the form of cash or other investments, then (estate planning aside) you probably won’t need life insurance during retirement.

If, on the other hand, you’ll be earning an income during retirement, and somebody else will be dependent upon that income, life insurance will be an integral part of your retirement plan.

Retiring Soon? Pick Up a Copy of My Book:

Can I Retire Cover

Can I Retire? Managing a Retirement Portfolio Explained in 100 Pages or Less

Topics Covered in the Book:
  • How to calculate how much you’ll need saved before you can retire,
  • How to minimize the risk of outliving your money,
  • How to choose which accounts (Roth vs. traditional IRA vs. taxable) to withdraw from each year,
  • Click here to see the full list.

A Testimonial from a Reader on Amazon:

"Hands down the best overview of what it takes to truly retire that I've ever read. In jargon free English, this gem of a book nails the key issues."

May 26, 2010 4 comments

For the most part, people are risk averse. We prefer not to take on any additional risk unless there’s an increase in expected return.

On occasion, however, we’re not risk averse. We’re risk seeking. When we go to a casino or play the lottery, we’re taking on risk despite the fact that our bets have a negative expected return.

Why? Because in some contexts, risk is fun. It’s entertainment.

Picking Stocks for Fun

Many investors like to pick stocks for fun. For them, attempting to outsmart (and outperform) the market is an enjoyable intellectual challenge. (And for the record, I see nothing wrong with that, as long as they’re aware that the value is in the entertainment rather than in the likelihood of success.)

But what does this have to do with those of us who are buy and hold investors, who have no interest in picking stocks? In short, we may want to attempt to avoid investments that carry a high entertainment value.

The most obvious examples of such investments are penny stocks and IPOs. Because so many people use them like lottery tickets, their long-term historical returns (as a group) are rather low, despite their high risk.

Further, some experts–William Bernstein in The Investor’s Manifesto, for instance–argue that a part of the reason for value stocks having slightly higher historical long-term returns than growth stocks is that growth stocks (especially small-cap ones) carry a higher entertainment value than value stocks.

In other words, it’s fun to try to pick the next Microsoft or the next Google, so many people try to do exactly that. And in the process, they drive prices of small-cap growth stocks upward and returns downward.

The natural response, of course, is to actively seek to make your stock portfolio as boring and unglamorous as possible. The less popularity or entertainment value an investment has, the better.

May 24, 2010 7 comments

Happy Friday, Dear Reader!

I didn’t realize it until just now, but for whatever reason, none of the articles I tagged for this week’s roundup were investing related. So we have “money saving articles” and “other” as the two categories.

I hope you enjoy ‘em. :)

Money-Saving Articles

Other Personal Finance Articles

Oblivious Investor on Tour

Blog Carnivals

Thanks for reading!

May 21, 2010 5 comments

A Roth IRA is not an investment. Rather, it’s a type of investment account, in which you can invest in any number of different things (stocks, bonds, mutual funds, etc.).

What’s unique about a Roth IRA is that you are not taxed on the interest, dividends, or capital gains in the account. Provided that you meet a few requirements (discussed below), everything that comes out of a Roth IRA is tax-free.

Note: This is in contrast to a traditional IRA. With a traditional IRA (if you meet certain requirements) you receive a deduction when you put money in, but everything is taxable as income when it comes out.

Opening a Roth IRA

There are numerous brokerage firms with which you could open a Roth IRA. For the most part, where you open an IRA won’t have much impact on what investments you have access to. As a result, I’d suggest focusing on low costs and good customer service.

My suggestion for most circumstances is Vanguard. You can see my Vanguard IRA Review here.

    Roth IRA Contribution and Income Limits

    For 2010, the maximum contribution to a Roth IRA is $5,000 ($6,000 if you’re age 50 or over). However, your eligibility to make a maximum contribution depends upon your income:

    • If you’re single, you can make a full contribution to a Roth IRA if your 2010 Modified Adjusted Gross Income is less than $106,000.
    • If you’re married filing jointly, you can make a full contribution to a Roth IRA if your 2010 Modified Adjusted Gross Income is less than $167,000.

    Roth IRA Conversions

    A Roth IRA conversion occurs when you take money out of a traditional IRA (or other tax-deferred IRA, such as a SEP) and move it to a Roth IRA. Depending upon a few factors, such as how you expect your tax bracket in retirement to compare to your current tax bracket, this move may save you a good deal of money.

    Related resources:

    Taking Money Out of a Roth IRA

    With the exception of amounts converted from a traditional IRA, contributions to a Roth can be withdrawn free from tax and penalty at any time. To avoid penalty and tax on withdrawals of earnings, you’ll have to jump through a few hoops.

    Related resources:

    May 19, 2010 0 comments

    Disclaimer #1: Many of the links on this site are affiliate links. That means that if you click through from my link and buy the linked-to product, or sign up for the linked-to service, I receive a commission. For example, if you click through to Amazon via one of my links, I receive a commission of approximately 7% for any product you purchase.


    Disclaimer #2: By using this site, you explicitly agree to its Terms of Use and agree not to hold Simple Subjects, LLC or any of its members liable in any way for damages arising from decisions you make based on the information made available on this site. I am not a financial or investment advisor, and the information on this site is for informational and entertainment purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.


    Copyright 2012 Simple Subjects, LLC - All rights reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Policy