Increasing Your Income: Weekend Reading

Some of my favorites for the week. :)

Personal Finance

Frugal Dad mentions the fact that increasing your income can have an even greater impact on your financial situation than living frugally.

MoneyNing explains what to do when you lose your credit card.

Taxes

Taxgirl hunts down those responsible for spreading false information about a second rebate check.

From my tax blog, one old and one new:

Yielding Wealth discusses what to do when you can’t pay the taxes you owe.

Investing

Amateur Asset Allocator says that Socially Responsible Investing is a scam! (If you look in the comments, you’ll see that I agree.)

It sounds like Trent at the Simple Dollar is ignoring the market noise. :) Here’s my favorite quote:

We are not living through anything that even compares to the Great Depression, and to even imply that we are is simultaneously deeply insulting to those who did live through it as well as woefully ignorant as to what it was like.

ABCs of Investing explains 529 savings plans.

Monevator explains the concept of liquidity.

Hope you enjoy them as much as I did. :)

Folio Investing IRA Review

This is a guest post from John Gay, CFP of ffplan.com, an online investment advisory practice.

Although not a household name, Folio Investing offers something that virtually no other brokerage firm does: the ability to easily and accurately implement and maintain a percentage-based investment plan.

Most brokerage firms are stuck in the 1950′s. “Hey, Jim-Bob, can you buy me 100 shares of XYZ stock?”

Who does that any more? Most people want to execute a percentage-based asset allocation plan. Let’s say I have 8 different ETFs that I want to buy in a pre-set percentage. To do that at a traditional brokerage firm, I have to convert percentages to dollars then dollars to shares and then individually place each trade. There’s significant time and effort involved, not to mention a high margin of error (what if I miscalculate and buy $100,000 instead of $10,000? what if I overbuy my IRA?).

Then, one year later, if my allocation is off, rebalancing involves a spreadsheet exercise which can quickly get time-consuming and complicated (for example, 8 funds across 4 different accounts creates a multitude of calculations and transactions… and if you’re “tax-engineering” your portfolio across taxable and tax-deferred accounts? What a nightmare).

Folio’s technology platform is built on percentages. It is similar to a 401(k) environment. You create a “folio” and then “subscribe” one or more of your accounts to that folio. Their platform then does all of the calculations and with a few clicks you are invested precisely according to spec.

When you rebalance, Folio offers multiple options from “rebalance only” which buys and sells as appropriate to get you to your target, to “buy only rebalance” and “sell only rebalance” which allow you to deposit or withdraw funds in a way that leaves your account as close to target after the funds are added or withdrawn.

The platform alone would be worth paying a premium for, but Folio offers all trades for $4. That includes stocks, ETFs and mutual funds. Even Vanguard index funds can be bought and sold for $4 each on their basic plan (many brokerage firms charge a premium for Vanguard and other funds, sometimes as high as $75!). Do note, however, that Folio’s basic plan fees are subject to a $15 quarterly minimum and they also charge an annual $25 per IRA fee (they outsource the trustee duties to a bank). Folio also offers an “unlimited” plan for $29 per month which allows unlimited “window” trading and discounted stop and limit orders.

Other valuable features include an almost paperless account opening and transfer environment, automated “specific share” bookkeeping on taxable accounts, and a simple yet powerful performance screen. The performance screen calculates a true “time-weighted” rate of return over any time period you specify and allows you to compare performance to a multitude of indexes or any mutual fund or stock.

Last of all, Folio’s platform allows easy collaboration with others. As a financial adviser, my Folio clients can give me “view-only” access with a few clicks so I can “look over their shoulder” to make sure they have executed my recommendations correctly and to monitor when rebalancing changes are warranted. Or, you can delegate full trading authority to your adviser or someone else to place transactions on your behalf. You can also easily give access to your CPA to pull up tax docs, or to anyone else you choose.

If you want to give their system a try, you can open up an account in minutes and until it’s funded, they don’t charge you. You can set up “test folios” that simulate the real thing to your heart’s content to decide if their platform will meet your needs.

If you think Folio Investing might be a good fit for you, here’s the page to open an account.

If you’d like to compare Folio Investing to other brokerage firms, here’s a comparison of IRAs at various discount brokerage firms.


Edward Jones IRA Review

Let’s start with the obvious: If you don’t feel that you need a financial advisor, there is absolutely no reason to have an account at Edward Jones. You can go elsewhere and find less expensive funds, less expensive stock trades, and lower account fees.

If, however, you do need a financial advisor, should Ed Jones be one of the places to consider?

Let’s take a look.

Advantages of Edward Jones

The primary selling point of Edward Jones is their broad network of local offices. In most parts of the U.S., there will be a Jones office not too far from where you live. If face-to-face interaction with your brokerage firm is important to you, Jones is hard to beat in terms of convenience.

The second primary advantage of Edward Jones is that you’ll have no difficulty understanding your advisor’s recommendations. Jones’ investment philosophy is straightforward. They suggest that you buy and hold a portfolio of comprised of:

  1. blue chip stocks,
  2. bonds, and
  3. actively managed mutual funds (i.e., funds that seek to earn above-market returns).

Edward Jones Commissions and Costs

Per a phone call to Edward Jones’ customer service line, their commissions per stock trade are based on the size of the trade and break down as follows:

  • 2.5% for trades less than $6,000
  • 2% + $30 for trades between $6,000 and $10,000
  • 1.5% + $80 for trades between $10,000 and $25,000
  • 1% + $205 for trades between $25,000 and $100,000

That’s likely hundreds of dollars more per trade than you’d pay with a typical discount brokerage firm. Between that and their $40 annual IRA fee, Edward Jones isn’t exactly on the list of cost-effective places to invest.

Edward Jones Conflicts of Interest

The biggest drawback to having an account at Edward Jones (and the other “full-service” brokerage firms like Merrill Lynch and Wachovia) is that your financial advisor is paid on commission. Specifically, Edward Jones financial advisors earn money when you:

  • Buy or sell a stock,
  • Buy a bond, or
  • Buy a mutual fund that charges a sales load.

This payment system leads to Edward Jones clients receiving advice that’s biased in a few ways. For example, an Edward Jones financial advisor will never recommend a no-load mutual fund (even when that’s the best option for the client) because he/she won’t receive a commission if you purchase such a fund.

An additional conflict of interest is created by the fact that Edward Jones receives “revenue sharing” payments from a handful of fund companies.

In other words, certain fund companies pay Edward Jones in order to receive preferential treatment. So if you’re a Jones client, you can expect your advisor’s recommendations to consist almost exclusively of the following fund families:

  • American Funds
  • Federated Securities
  • Franklin Templeton
  • Goldman Sachs
  • Hartford Investments
  • Lord Abbett
  • MFS Funds
  • Oppenheimer Funds
  • Putnam
  • Van Kampen Funds

No Online Trading

While it’s easy to check your holdings and account balances on Edward Jones’ website, they don’t actually provide any online trading capability whatsoever. If you want to execute any transactions, you’ll have to call your broker.

The official Jones position is that the lack of online trading is intended to prevent rash investment decisions. To some extent, that makes sense. Personally, however, I find it frustrating. I want to be able to do what I please with my money without having to talk it over with somebody.

Summary

Pros:

  • Local offices,
  • Personal customer service,
  • Easy-to-understand investment philosophy.

Cons:

  • Significant conflicts of interest between you and your advisor,
  • High costs.

In most cases, if you feel that you need a financial advisor, I’d suggest going with one who charges a simple hourly or annual fee rather than one who is paid via commission. By using a fee-only advisor, you’ll get unbiased advice, and you’ll likely reduce the overall costs on your investment portfolio.

If you’d like to compare Edward Jones to other brokerage firms, here’s a comparison of IRAs at various discount brokerage firms.


There’s Always Somebody Who Wants to Take Your Money

Just yesterday, I came across this post on Free Money Finance (one of my favorite personal finance/investing blogs). It’s an interview with the editor of a service that ranks Fidelity’s funds for you. At the end, the editor offered this choice wisdom:

[Our] system is based on four basic principles: 1) concentrate on Fidelity Investments Select mutual funds, 2) stay 100% invested, 3) monitor the performance of potential funds and move regularly to better performing funds, and 4) stay diversified. [Emphasis added.]

Regularly move to funds that have recently had better than average performance? What a novel and wonderful idea!

Err, wait. There’s already a name for that. It’s called chasing performance. And pretty much the entire investing world knows it’s a great way to ensure subpar results.

Paying somebody to try to beat the market is an endeavor that often proves unsuccessful. Paying somebody to help you find somebody to pay to help you beat the market just makes your odds even worse (more total expenses). And with a plan as questionable as this one…

Call me cynical, but I think “better performing funds” is just a euphemism. All we can really see is how well the funds have performed in the past. (Perhaps there is confusion about the idea that last month–while recent–is still in the past.) And frankly, this doesn’t tell us a great deal about how they’re about to do.

Did this not set off red flags for anybody else when they read it?

Can Risk Tolerance Change?

In an interview with Money Magazine editor Eric Schurenberg, author/associate professor/retirement expert Moshe Milevsky made the following statement that I particularly enjoyed:

I think advisers tend to take the mental aspect a little too far. People’s risk tolerance changes every day. Yesterday the market is up: People are risk tolerant. Today the market plummets: They’re no longer risk tolerant. You should build your retirement portfolios on something more stable than just your mood this morning.

I think Milevsky makes a great point that it’s all to easy for an investor to let 5 consecutive years of positive returns lure him into thinking that he’s more risk tolerant than he really is.

What I really like though is that he brings up the idea that risk tolerance isn’t a static thing. This is something I’ve been pondering myself as I’m working my way through The Four Pillars of Investing.

The author (William Bernstein) suggests in a few places that you should guess conservatively when estimating your risk tolerance. That is, if you think you’re a pretty risk tolerant person, who could handle the volatility that comes with a 90% stock portfolio, it’s likely better to try an 80% stock portfolio just to ensure that you don’t panic when things go wrong.

That’s the conventional wisdom. And it makes sense. But you already know how I feel about it.

Also, this type of suggestion assumes that a person’s risk tolerance is set in stone.

Doesn’t knowledge increase risk tolerance?

To me, the more a person knows about markets (and, more specifically, their cyclical nature), the greater her risk tolerance. After all, if you’ve researched enough about market history, you know that downturns are followed by upturns. That’s just how things work.

And if you’re perfectly calm during a market crash because you’re aware that the market will come back up at some point, isn’t that the very definition of risk tolerance?

So if knowledge leads to confidence (and confidence is the same as risk tolerance), doesn’t that mean that a person can increase his risk tolerance simply by taking the time to educate himself about market history?

And finally, if a person can increase his risk tolerance via learning, wouldn’t this be a worthwhile thing to do (as opposed to simply being content with a more conservative/lower returning asset allocation your whole life)?

Thoughts on Barack Obama’s Inaugural Address

I just watched Obama’s inaugural address. Whether you voted for him or not (In case you’re curious: I did.), you’ve got to admit: The fellow has a way with words.

I feel that it would be a mistake not to spend a few moments reflecting upon some of the things he said. Frankly, I don’t feel that I have much to add, as the probability of me phrasing things as eloquently as he and his writers do is roughly zero.

Our challenges may be new. The instruments with which we meet them may be new. But those values upon which our success depends – hard work and honesty, courage and fair play, tolerance and curiosity, loyalty and patriotism – these things are old. These things are true. They have been the quiet force of progress throughout our history. What is demanded then is a return to these truths.

Hard work and fair play as the force of progress throughout history? Couldn’t agree more. A return to those values seems like a good thing. (Note: I’m pretty sure that bailing out failed companies doesn’t count as fair play.)

The success of our economy has always depended not just on the size of our Gross Domestic Product, but on the reach of our prosperity; on our ability to extend opportunity to every willing heart – not out of charity, but because it is the surest route to our common good.

As somebody who truly cherishes the spirit of entrepreneurship (and spreading it a little bit at a time), I can’t help but love it when somebody says that “extending opportunity to every willing heart” is the surest route to our common good.

There is nothing so satisfying to the spirit, so defining of our character, than giving our all to a difficult task.

I think we all know this to be true. I’m thankful to be able to do something for a living that I truly enjoy (writing about finances/investing/taxes). Guess I should get back to work. :)

Disclaimer: By using this site, you explicitly agree to its Terms of Use and agree not to hold Simple Subjects, LLC or any of its members liable in any way for damages arising from decisions you make based on the information made available on this site. I am not a financial or investment advisor, and the information on this site is for informational and entertainment purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.

Copyright 2012 Simple Subjects, LLC - All rights reserved. To be clear: This means that, aside from small quotations, the material on this site may not be republished elsewhere without my express permission. Terms of Use and Privacy Policy